0:00 / 02:08:45

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) Full Movie

Watch the full movie online in HD with our instant movie streaming service.

Watch Online

Download Now

Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)

Count Dracula, a 15th-century prince, is condemned to live off the blood of the living for eternity. Young lawyer Jonathan Harker is sent to Dracula's castle to finalise a land deal, but when the Count sees a photo of Harker's fiancée, Mina, the spitting image of his dead wife, he imprisons him and sets off for London to track her down.

Kindly Note: The movie player is displaying a full movie stream of "Bram Stoker's Dracula", which was in cinemas in 1992. To watch an alternative version, scroll further down to find direct links to more movies with the same title as this one from different years of production.

Watch The Full Movie brings you "Bram Stoker's Dracula" - the entire movie is free to watch online. Watch the complete movie from beginning to end on any Internet-connected device. Services from our providers give you access to Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) full movie streams. The full 128 minutes are available to watch right now exactly how the director intended - with no stoppages for adverts or other intrusions.

Thousands of popular movies just like Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) are ready and waiting for you to watch for free when you join one of the online full movie streaming services from our partner websites. Many award-winning movies are included with your free trial - not to mention this full movie version of Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992).

Watch hundreds of movies for free when you start a free trial. Get up to 30 days free access. The duration of the free trial varies by country/region and service provider. Offers may be changed or withdrawn at any time. Cancel your account during the free trial to avoid being charged any recurring subscription fees. Full terms and conditions can be read on the advertiser's website.

5 Comments

Post a review or comment on this movie…

imthenoob 12 Nov 2018

It's a visually stunning movie and still lives up in comparison to films nowadays but my lord, This has to be one of the worst acted movies I've ever seen. If it's not over-acting by the lead talent, It's the junk performance by Reeves that really drives it home. It's a hard film to finish because it's so laughably bad at times.

eva3si0n 23 Jul 2021

Francis Ford Coppola was scolded more in the last years of his career. Nevertheless, he passed his career peak by the beginning of the 1990s. Dracula is the last landmark film of his career. Great cast. Both recognized meters and only novice actors (Keanu Reeves is even aging?). Yes, the plot is surreal, the film is clearly shot in the wrong genre. If he were darker and closer to t would have turned out better, especially since Coppola had Hopkins and Oldman. And so it turned out a surreal drama.

KirsiM. 18 Nov 2007

Mistitled but a feast of interesting and stunningly beautiful images (this is, after all, a motion PICTURE), creating a dream-like atmosphere of period and fantasy. Mina and Lucy and their costumes look fabulous, albeit Stoker probably was spinning in his grave: one of his heroines was a vampires lover, other was a nymphomaniac! In Stokers novel, Lucy was the feminine ideal of " unequalled sweetness and purity" , the vampires were strong, sluttish and punishable, - yes, vamps. In this late 20th century version, red-haired firecracker Lucy, albeit clean like dewy rose in the world of crap called modern horror, is too uniinhibited to be Stokers weepy virgin. Violence and sex are stylized, never gross, and score is gorgeous. And Oldman? Much better than overrated Christopher Lee (who was never more than laughable sex fantasy) and actually quite good. Not Stokers Dracula, but great vampire flick.

Ben D 04 Nov 2008

In a way it's cold but strong,tone makes it in some way better than the the - maybe even overly romantic though beautiful and impressiove 1992 adaptation. And this version is visually beautiful as weel, plus sexy. But especially I liked the way the actor of Dracula portrayed him. The tense, arrogant, cunning and self-assurent being was really impressive. Especially when combined to the beautiful shaded eyes and that adorable wake of a smile we see in some scenes.

Johnny M 23 Jan 2010

I am an avid fan of the actors in this version of Stokers novel but I am afraid there were just too many liberties taken with the original for me to really enjoy it. Marc Warren can do creepy really well, Sophie Miles is a fine actress and David Suchet is excellent but not in this I'm afraid. The BBC did an excellent dramatisation in 1977 with Louis Jordan as the Count, but here they failed and by a long way. If you are not as precious about the original novel as I am then there may be much to enjoy here(the BBC do Victorian like no one else) but don't expect much Stoker. I give it 40% bcause I like the above named actors so much.